Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Profile Picture
Mocktrocity
Member
Last Activity: Today, 02:23 PM
Joined: April 3rd, 2018
Location:
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    You have not actually read the appeal if you think this was Penn State's position. That was not their position and it has already been brought up previously...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    It is not a weird thing to do when you realize the ultimate position of Penn State is that the teams were co-equal, so they essentially believed they...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    We are now starting to rehash argument already gone over in this thread and getting away from the point. Take away internal designations and any comments...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Actually, you are right here looking back over some of the appeal. It appears Penn State co-equal argument may have originated from Bernstein's email...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 17th, 2019, 04:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    This is not correct. The rules said thta teams that were equally competitive were interchangeable, Googly confirmed this in an earlier post. If Penn State...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    The standard is the conduct must be egregious for the violation to result in such an extreme punishment. I am not going to go looking through the old...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 17th, 2019, 04:33 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Don't post the email then, post the rationale behind the argument in the email. If there is legitimately a mathematical analysis that counters Bloch's,...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 17th, 2019, 04:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I've said before, I had access to the entire chain but only saved a portion of the emails that were representative of the entire thread. If anyone has...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Just to comment on this, if you read the appeal, there are emails attached by Justin Bernstein where he informed Penn State that if they truly believed...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 17th, 2019, 02:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Dismissive sure, because many of the Board members positions posted are nonsense that try to cover up for their mistake in 2012. Googly explicitly called...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    The AMTA community deserves the transparency. AMTA has just removed postseason bids from a team, for only the second time ever. The first time, as evidenced...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 17th, 2019, 12:21 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I saw his emails back then on the sanctions and he did not debate the merits of the appeal, just the consequences of the sanction, as I have maintained...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Googlemcoogles edited his post multiple times but at one point, he specifically said my timing of the initial emails was misleading and indicated there...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I had access to all of those emails at one time and still have a decent portion of them. The "vigorous debate" was over whether Penn State's...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 10:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I had the entirety of the chain back then. Admittedly, some of my comments are on my recollection of the entire chain, so my memory may be off. I only...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 09:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I think you are hitting on why some people have a hard time accepting that AMTA screwed up here. AMTA are the adults in the room. They run the show. They...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 08:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    As I said, I did not save the whole thread, just a select few responses. As I recall, the emails I posted were the two main positions advocated in the...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 08:38 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    I do not believe the AMTA Board is a group of volunteers trying to punish people that they never met. I do believe that the AMTA Board, in 2012, was derelict...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 05:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Honestly, I'd be hard pressed to call this "re-litigation" when AMTA did not really discuss it the first time around. The biggest problem with...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Mocktrocity
    replied to New Sanctions?
    Penn State used the results of three tournaments to make their case that the teams were co-equal, not just Regionals. I've touched on them in previous...
    See more | Go to post
    Last edited by Mocktrocity; January 16th, 2019, 03:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:

No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X